Government Records
Government records are treated as primary evidence. Claims about suppression or confiscation must be tied to specific documents, dates, and agencies. If a claim lacks documentation, it is labeled as an allegation.
Key Facts
- The FBI Vault Tesla file is a post-1943 government record set and should be cited page by page.
- The Supreme Court Marconi opinion is a primary legal source, not a broad slogan about radio invention.
- Suppression claims need court orders, agency records, or contemporaneous press tied to exact dates.
- The FBI Files Explorer provides a checklist for missing-papers claims.
FBI Vault — Nikola Tesla
The FBI Vault provides post‑1943 records and related documents. We maintain the full PDFs locally and will reference exact page numbers in claims and summaries.
Supreme Court — Marconi Wireless v. United States (1943)
The U.S. Reports volume containing Marconi Wireless v. United States provides the official Supreme Court opinion discussing patent precedence and related technical history. This is a primary legal source; interpretive claims are labeled.
Missing Papers Standard
A responsible missing-papers claim should identify the agency or repository, the document date, the exact file or page, and the language that supports the conclusion. If a record merely shows posthumous interest in Tesla’s materials, the claim should stay narrow and avoid implying an official suppression program without corroboration.
Sources
Frequently Asked Questions
Do the FBI files prove Tesla’s papers were suppressed?
Not as a blanket claim. The FBI Vault files are primary records, but suppression claims need exact page-level evidence and corroboration.
How should I cite the FBI file?
Cite the FBI Vault release part, exact page image or document date, and what the record says. Avoid citing the whole file for a broad conclusion.
Related Government Record Tools
Continue with adjacent source pages and tools.